Articles Posted in Criminal Sexual Conduct

A Macomb County man charged with 12 counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and four counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct spent years litigating a single evidentiary question before his trial could begin. The complainants are three sisters who began living with him when they were minors. He denies the allegations and is presumed innocent on every count.

The question was this. A 2010 police report described one of the sisters being sexually abused years earlier by another relative, abuse that allegedly included being forced to watch pornography. The defense argued the jury needed that history for a limited purpose: without it, jurors would assume the child could only describe such acts because the defendant committed them. The trial court excluded the evidence under Michigan’s rape-shield statute. The Court of Appeals affirmed, relying on a 1998 case that required a criminal conviction for the prior abuse before a jury could ever hear about it.

On July 14, 2025, the Michigan Supreme Court decided People v. Masi, affirming in part, vacating in part, and sending the case back to the Macomb Circuit Court under a new standard. The opinion was unanimous among the six participating justices, written by Justice Kyra Bolden. It is the most important rape-shield decision in Michigan in a generation, and anyone facing a criminal sexual conduct charge involving a child complainant needs to understand both halves of it.

Karl Butler was charged in Kalamazoo County with five counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and one count of home invasion over a 2009 incident. He admitted the sexual contact and said it was consensual. His defense turned on evidence that the complainant had accused two other men of sexual assault in 2008, and that the accusation was false: the defense had statements from the two men and police reports on the earlier investigation.

The pretrial fight over that evidence consumed years. The trial court first denied the motion to admit it. On a renewed motion, the court changed course and ruled that the testimony could come in, but it never first held the closed evidentiary hearing Michigan law requires. The Court of Appeals reversed and held the evidence should be excluded. In March 2024, the Michigan Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, vacated that decision too. Both lower courts had skipped the required step: once the defense produced some apparently credible and potentially admissible evidence that the earlier allegation was false, the trial court had to hold an in camera evidentiary hearing before deciding anything about admissibility.

People v. Butler is one recent answer to a question that runs through nearly every Michigan criminal sexual conduct prosecution: when does the exclusion of defense evidence cross the line from ordinary evidence law into a violation of the constitutional right to present a defense? The Michigan Supreme Court has confronted that question twice in two years, in Butler and in the 2025 rape-shield decision People v. Masi, and the Court of Appeals added a published decision on records discovery, People v. Leonard, in June 2026.

Original Case Details

An individual was charged with criminal sexual conduct in the first degree upon the accusation that he threatened an 11-year-old girl with a belt, forcing sexual penetration on the girl. The girl told her brother about this accusation, and they both went to the police. The defendant voluntarily went to the police department and answered questions from the police for approximately three hours. The entire interrogation was recorded on videotape, but the videotape was never admitted into evidence at trial. During the trial, a detective testified that the defendant said that the truth was “probably somewhere in the middle” of the defendant and alleged victim’s story.

Defense counsel cross-examined the detective on this statement, asserting that this statement was actually made by a detective, and not the defendant himself. Defense counsel requested the court show the video to the jury, but the prosecutor objected, and the judge refused to allow the video into evidence. The defendant was convicted at the conclusion of the trial and sentenced to 25-60 years in prison. On appeal, the Michigan Court of Appeals viewed the video and found that the detective, in fact, made the statement in question, not the defendant.

Original Case Details

As detailed in a previous blog, former Grand Traverse County Jail Administrator Todd Ritter is facing multiple allegations relating to inappropriate relationships with current and former female jail inmates. Investigations into Ritter uncovered explicit text messages and photographs involving female inmates of the Grand Traverse County Jail. He is also accused of misappropriating funds by allegedly taking a female inmate to a Lansing hotel and expensing the hotel room to Grand Traverse County. Other accusations include stealing drug test kits and keeping certain female prisoners past their sentences for personal satisfaction. As an overall maximum, Ritter is facing up to 15 years in prison based on his current criminal charges. A listing of Ritter’s criminal charges and potential penalties are listed below.

Criminal Charges and Penalties

Original Case Details

A now-former Flint police officer is facing multiple charges for multiple child sex offenses now with two alleged victims. Justin McLeod is alleged to have molested a girl under the age of 13 and another young female whose age has not been publicly disclosed. McLeod faces nine criminal charges related to each alleged victim. The second alleged victim is reportedly now an adult. She alleges that McLeod sexually abused her for a period of two and a half years while she was a child. McLeod faced initial investigation when the first alleged victim contacted a forensic nurse examiner and discussed her allegations of sexual abuse against McLeod. In response, the Genesee County Sheriff’s Office, the Flushing Township Police Department, and the Genesee Human Oppression Strike Team (GHOST) worked together to raid McLeod’s residence to take him into custody. He was initially arraigned on nine felony charges related to the first alleged victim and about a week later was arraigned on nine more on a second alleged victim who just came forward. McLeod worked with the Flint Police Department for five years and was part of the K9 and motorcycle units. He remains in custody at the Genesee County Jail without bond.

Criminal Charges and Potential Penalties

Original Case Details

A man from the Northern Michigan County of Roscommon was recently found guilty of multiple sex crimes that allege he held a woman against her will and forced her to clean his house and perform sex acts. The woman was actually herself arrested for stealing a vehicle, but she told Roscommon County police officers that she escaped from a home where she was being held against her will and was being forced into prostitution. She said that two men, James Jarrell and Jeffrey Kobel were her captors and that they also dealt drugs from the home. She told police that she was taken from her home in Ypsilanti and was forced to be in Northern Michigan by the men. Multiple police and investigative agencies cooperated to respond to the home where these men were alleged to live. The Michigan State Police sent the Emergency Support Team (EST), the Strike Team Investigative Narcotics Group (STING), the Houghton Lake Post, and a police canine to join the Crawford County Sheriff’s Office in executing a search warrant on Jarrell and Kobel’s home. The men were arrested and criminally charged. Jarrell was recently found guilty on his charges while Kobel awaits his trial.

Criminal Charges and Penalties

Original Case Details

An Allegan County Judge is under fire for emails uncovered that show the judge communicating privately with a prosecutor about a case she presided over during a jury trial. Allegan Circuit Court Judge Margaret Zuzich-Bakker emailed Allegan County Prosecutor Myrene Koch as witnesses testified in front of her and inquired about the answers she was hearing and about the general investigation of the case. The Allegan County Prosecutor responded to the initial email and continued to have substantive conversations about the case. The case in question was a multi-count criminal sexual conduct case. The defendant in the case was charged and convicted with two counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, one count of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, and two counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct. He was later sentenced by Judge Zuzich-Bakker to a minimum of 20 years in prison for each conviction which run concurrently. When it was discovered Judge Zuzich-Bakker had privately communicated with the prosecutor’s office during the trial in question, an appeal was made to the court. Judge William Baillargeon decided in favor of the appellant and granted him a new trial. If you are facing an investigation or criminal charges related to accusations of sexual assault, then it is important that you speak to an experienced criminal defense attorney as soon as possible.

Trial Judge’s Objectionable Emails

Original Case Details

A 17-year-old from Detroit is facing multiple criminal charges as an adult stemming from four different incidents that allege that he sexually assaulted multiple women and used a firearm to commit multiple crimes. Jaden Deangelo Jones is firstly accused of sexually assaulting a woman 41 years of age on Grand River in Detroit. He is also accused of firing a single shot at a 36-year-old woman who rejected his sexual advances about an hour later on Pierson near Grand River in Detroit. Investigators also believe that Jones grabbed a woman 67 years of age by her buttocks, robbed her at gunpoint, and followed her home before he fled after seeing the woman’s husband. Lastly, he is alleged to have robbed a woman 43 years of age at gunpoint and also sexually assaulted her on Lahser in Detroit. Jones is currently being held on all four cases separately. He is currently being held on cash bonds that total over $2 million.

Criminal Charges and Potential Penalties

Original Case Details

Former Grand Traverse County Jail Administrator is facing serious accusations involving the sexual assault and explicit relationships with current and former female inmates. Allegations involving Ritter having inappropriate relationships with female inmates surfaced last year during an internal investigation that uncovered sexually charged text messages and explicit photographs of former and current inmates on his government-issued cell phone and laptop. He is accused of taking a former inmate to a Lansing hotel and then expensing it to the County, as well as signing onto a corrections department computer to a single mother dating website and further saving a profile as “Big Tex.” He is also accused of stealing drug test kits neglecting his duty to make sound financial decisions with county money by costing Grand Traverse County nearly $10,000 in keeping a specific female prisoner past her sentence while sending other inmates to other jails at the County’s expense. His bond was set at $50,000 at his arraignment.

Criminal Charges and Potential Penalties

Original Case Details

A 21-year-old man from Genoa Township was convicted of multiple counts of Criminal Sexual Conduct in the first degree, second degree, and assault with the intent to commit sexual penetration back in March 11 of this year. The alleged victim testified that the man raped her multiple times at a golf course after they went riding together on a golf cart looking for a deer back in 2018. Prosecutors previously offered to dismiss three of the criminal sexual conduct charges, as part of a plea agreement, a deal which the man declined to take. He now faces up to life in prison.

Allegations Made Against Assistant Prosecutor

Contact Information